<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Polls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.270towin.com/blog/2008-polls/new-polls/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.270towin.com/blog/2008-polls/new-polls</link>
	<description>This isn't a Popularity Contest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:54:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.270towin.com/blog/2008-polls/new-polls/comment-page-1#comment-1994</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 00:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.270towin.com/blog/2008-polls/new-polls#comment-1994</guid>
		<description>Looks like Obama will win the majority!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Obama will win the majority!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.270towin.com/blog/2008-polls/new-polls/comment-page-1#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.270towin.com/blog/2008-polls/new-polls#comment-470</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your note.   We&#039;re not a huge fan of the &#039;poll of polls&#039; concept.   While it seems to make people feel more comfortable, it is statistically suspect to take separate polls and average them.   At the same time, there really shouldn&#039;t be much difference in the polls if they are all conducted properly.  As for Rasmussen, we haven&#039;t seen much of a bias (although we&#039;ve heard this from others).  The biggest issue we see is that they only survey 500 people for each poll --- a sample size small enough to yield a 4-5% margin of error.   All else equal, we try and use polls where a larger population is surveyed --- Quinnipiac is particularly good in this area, usually including about 1,500 respondents in their polls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your note.   We&#8217;re not a huge fan of the &#8216;poll of polls&#8217; concept.   While it seems to make people feel more comfortable, it is statistically suspect to take separate polls and average them.   At the same time, there really shouldn&#8217;t be much difference in the polls if they are all conducted properly.  As for Rasmussen, we haven&#8217;t seen much of a bias (although we&#8217;ve heard this from others).  The biggest issue we see is that they only survey 500 people for each poll &#8212; a sample size small enough to yield a 4-5% margin of error.   All else equal, we try and use polls where a larger population is surveyed &#8212; Quinnipiac is particularly good in this area, usually including about 1,500 respondents in their polls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron</title>
		<link>http://www.270towin.com/blog/2008-polls/new-polls/comment-page-1#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.270towin.com/blog/2008-polls/new-polls#comment-469</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been  visiting this site a lot lately. i like it, however the suggestion i would make is having wither a polls of polls or 3 different polls. evertime i see either the right leaning rasmussen or one of the left ones i take it with a grain of salt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been  visiting this site a lot lately. i like it, however the suggestion i would make is having wither a polls of polls or 3 different polls. evertime i see either the right leaning rasmussen or one of the left ones i take it with a grain of salt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

