2008 Presidential Election Interactive Map and History of the Electoral College
270toWin header image 2

Hillary vs. Rudy Head-to-Head

November 26th, 2007   ·   2 Comments   ·   Email This Post Email This Post   ·   URI

**Update on 1/13/08   We’ve temporarily reverted this feature to display based on 2004 actual results.   Given the results in IA and NH, there are clearly no front runners yet in either party, and the polling is all over the place depending on which two candidates are compared.    Once it is more clear who the nominees will be (hopefully by Super Tuesday on Feb. 5), we will return to using 2008 actual polls and tie those into the swing states map.**

Please read this post before using the information that follows.

We’ve populated our “Probability of 270″ beta feature (below the interactive map) with some early general election polls of Giuliani vs. Clinton. We’re not predicting these will be the candidates, but this combination seems at least as likely as any other, and it is one with the most polling available.

Note that we weren’t able to locate polls for every state, and some polls are a couple months old. We tried to grab the most recent one available. Many of those states where polling wasn’t available were states with wide margins in 2004, which likely will still be one-sided in 2008. For these, and a few closer ones, we will continue to use the 2004 actual results until actual polls become available.

Given the above, we’re still going to keep this in ‘beta mode’ for the time being.

Polling sources for 11/26/07 update:

The following states are still using 2004 results: AK, DC, DE, HI, ID, IN, LA, MS, MT, NE, ND, NV, SC, SD, UT, VT, WV, WY

Tags: 2008 Polls

2 responses so far ↓

  • 1 270toWin // Dec 7, 2007 at 10:43 am

    Some new polls we’ve added to the hypothetical Hillary v. Rudy matchup since 11/26. First number is Hillary, 2nd Rudy:

    PA 44-44 (12/5, Quinnipiac)
    OH 45-41 (12/5, Quinnipiac)
    FL 48-41 (12/5, Quinnipiac)
    AR 49-35 (12/3, Quinnipiac)
    AL 45-50 (11/30, SurveyUSA)
    MA 54-40 (11/29, SurveyUSA)
    CO 44-50 (11/28, Rasmussen)
    AZ 38-47 (11/28, Rasmussen)
    NY 56-37 (11/28, SurveyUSA)
    CA 52-41 (11/27, SurveyUSA)

    Question for those that follow this stuff closely… what pollsters have you found to be most accurate or inaccurate in the past? Please add a comment with your thoughts.

  • 2 Bill Johnson // Dec 29, 2007 at 11:03 am

    I have found that, in general, Rasmussen tends to skew about 2 or 3 points towards the Republican, while SurveyUSA tends to do the same towards the Democrat. But keep in mind that this is not always the case.

Leave a Comment

About this Site
270towin.com is an interactive Electoral College map for 2008 and a history of Presidential elections in the United States. Since electoral votes are generally allocated on an "all or none" basis by state, the election of a U.S President is about winning the popular vote in enough states to achieve 270 electoral votes, a majority of the 538 that are available. It is not about getting the most overall popular votes, as we saw in the 2000 election, when the electoral vote winner (Bush) and the popular vote winner (Gore) were different.

Contact Us:  
Sponsorships   |   Licensing   |   Feedback   |   Media Inquiries Blog   |   Tell Others About This Site   |   Bookmark This Page

Copyright © 2004-2008 270towin.com All Rights Reserved     S2